I’m actually a fan of the Chrome OS model for a lot of people who just want internet access for streaming, social media, email, and other web services. The list of advantages is pretty strong.
Cost, as chrome books are inexpensive, it’s a low barrier to entry.
Deep integration with Google services, get one log on and go.
Long battery life (because stupidly low power requirements).
Very secure due to the “thinnish client” model and central security work by Google.
The list of downsides is also something to consider.
Cost, because it’s cheap the products often feel cheap.
Deep integration with Google means big brother is always watching.
No real “gaming”, at least not anything that isn’t a web based.
Limited repair options.
I bring up limited repair options as I had my first Chromebook die on the operating table today. The book would boot to a “Chrome OS missing” and then direct me to install a recovery media (USB or SD card) and no matter what I did, even going so far as to download the original Chrome OS version, would hit an “unexpected error” and fail to recover. But, for a used education model I paid 50 bucks for off of Newegg, I definitely got my money’s worth.
So, for people on the cheap like students, or people who need someone else to handle their security (like the elderly), then Chrome OS makes a very solid option. For anyone who likes to game, or code, or run unsigned software, then Chrome OS is definitely not for you. Unlike Apple products, which are sold at a premium and therefore have generally good resale value, Chrome OS products do not.
The “end of life/planned obsolescence” model that Google uses for Android phones is the same for Chromebooks. But, since Google doesn’t manufacture the computers, it works with industry partners. Some are decent like Acer and Samsung, others are less rapid in software patching….
But, for the low cost of the device, when it is end of lifed, you CAN afford to get a replacement. Nothing wrong with that business model.
Wandering Through The Night 