The Cattaraugus 225Q Knife

If you had to describe the “average” US military knife from WWII, it would be a bowie pattern blade with fullers (aka blood grooves) between 5 and 7 inches long made of a high carbon steel, usually 1095, which was through hardened (possibly tempered) with a stacked leather handle. This “average” knife would be made in New York. I guess the next most average knife would be a dagger pattern, or half dagger pattern, with similar metallurgy and handle composition between all the M3 and similar knives like the V42.

WWII Came at the tail end of the Great Depression and the War Department had to outfit the three branches of the military, Army, Navy, and Marine Corps, with kit ranging from uniforms to combat knives. The vast majority of the fighting knives used by the US military in WWII were built in New York by companies such as Cammilus (from the town of the same name), Ka-Bar (Olean, NY), the Utica Knife Company (in Utica, NY), and Cattaraugus knives, in Cattaraugus County where the Ontario Knife Company also made its home. The Case knife company was relatively close by in Pennsylvania (and founded by the Case brothers who had worked at Cattaraugus). The PAL knife company of Chicago purchased the Remington knife line and produced a large number of the “Remington PAL” knives for WWII (and PAL operated at least one factory in New York). The Marbles company, of Gladstone, Michigan, saw a number of privately purchased “Ideal” knives used in WWII, as did the Western Cutlery Company of Colorado. But, all of the outside NY companies were rather minor players compared to those in NY.

Of course the most famous knife of WWII is the US Navy Mk2 Combat Knife, which has becomes synonymous with the Ka-Bar company due to good advertising on behalf of that company.  The “USMC Fighting Knife” pattern has been produced by Remington PAL, Cammilus, Ka-Bar, Ontario, and many others.

But this post is not about the famous “Ka-Bar” pattern, it is about the Cattaraugus 225Q or the Case 337-6-Q knives (almost visually identical to each other). These have less of a “fighting knife” profile and a much more obvious “sporting” profile as the Q has a sufficiently deep belly for skinning, and a fifth of an inch thick blade for sturdiness, although the “blood grooves” are tiny and do very little to lighten the blade. The “three layered pommel” which is unique to the “Q” knives has given rise to the urban legend that the purpose was to hammer nails on crates by the Quartermaster corps (a legend somewhat supported as the son of the Cattaraugus president served in the US Army Quartermaster Corps and was given a custom 225Q by his father), alternately the “Q” was supposedly because the Quartermaster Corps was tasked with specifying a combat knife. My take on the matter is that the three layers of steel pommel were chosen to properly balance the blade, putting the center of gravity behind the guard rather than in front.

It is not definitively known whether the 225Q or 337-6-Q knives were official issue or a substitute official issue, although one guy stated that 1.2 million of the 225Qs were issued across all services although he didn’t leave a convenient citation for me to investigate. One soldier, who served stateside as an MP his entire WWII career wrote down that he acquired his 225Q at a local hardware store for 25 cents (at a time when a Marble’s Ideal knife was marketed for a buck twenty five) as the knives had been rejected from service (aka, “seconds”) and that the handles on those knives often needed sanding down which indicates that the 225Q was accepted by the Army for official issue. Another reported that his father purchased his 225Q from the “ship’s store” and carried it through the Pacific campaign, which indicates that the 225Qs were available but not standard issue.

The Case 337-6-Q knives had a different stacked leather handle configuration which didn’t have the same reputation for needing a good sanding. Despite the identical blade geometries the Case variant goes for a lot more on the market as there are more Case collectors than Cattaraugus collectors. A lot of the Q knives came with a “left handed sheath” and no one seems to know why, my guess is that is just how the stamping machine to make the sheaths was originally set up and no one saw anything wrong with it at the time. A more practical option is that if you have a gun in your right hand (most people shoot right handed and right eyed) then if you need to get your knife you should probably do it with your left hand, but whatever the real reason was it has been lost to history.

225Q_knife

Still, the 225Q is shorter than a Ka-Bar by an inch (despite using almost three more ounces of steel to make, much of it in the thicker blade and pommel), with a better belly for skinning, and a better blade design for standard camp chores or “bushcraft survival.” Like the Marble’s Ideal pattern knife, it’s a solid choice to carry with you out into the great unknown. It’s a tad heavier than other options, but if you want a truly lightweight option a Mora Companion is really the best choice rather than something that can double as a pry bar in a pinch.

EDIT: According to the source in the URL, the Q knives were specified by the Ordnance Department, with “Q” meaning that the knife was spec’d by the Quartermasters. It is unlikely that the the Army would have continually purchased Q knives after the adoption of the M3 trench knife, and it is unlikely the USMC would have continued purchasing Q knives after adopting the Kabar pattern fighting knife.  However it does make sense that they would continue to be available in troop stores long after they were official issue. http://www.usmilitaryknives.com/cr_commentaries_12.htm

Second Edit: In the television series “Motherland: Fort Salem” the Spree terrorists disguised as caterers can be seen using a Cattaragaus 225Q knife in Season 1 episodes 6 and and in flashbacks to the fight scene in episode 7. The distinctive pommel of the Cattaragaus is different than the Case Q knife, you’ll have to freeze the video at just the right time to see the difference.

Pommel profile of the Q knife, clearly showing the exposed tang style of a Cattaragaus 225Q

Blade profile of the Q knife, although the knife seems small in the actor’s hand

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to The Cattaraugus 225Q Knife

  1. Craig Mooslin says:

    Hi! Regarding the left-hand sheath: There is a great article on the 225 Q in the (1992-96?) Knife Digest issue. He says that at that time, US Marines were taught to fight with the knife held edge-up. A left-hand sheath would facilitate such a draw.

    Like

    • Ed says:

      I was issued a 225Q in 1969 in the U.S.M.C. when there were no “K-Bars” available. I wouldn’t trade my Cattaraugus for any number of “K-Bars.” I was taught knife fighting edge up, still “fight ” that way.

      Like

  2. Jeremiah says:

    Wow great article. Love the history behind these knives. I found your article because I have recently come into possession of a 225q. Its a heavy option for sure and is 1095 steel but it holds a amazing edge and works as a survival knife. Yes i use it on a daily basis. I’d rather use it then let it collect dust. Its a great knife and piece of history

    Like

  3. John Lewis says:

    I have collected knives for a long time and picked the Habit up from my older brother who also lives in New York.We have been enamored with Kabar’s since handling my Fathers from WWII
    The natural transition was when i found my first Qrter225Q just could not resist and another chapter started collecting and admiring our craftsman from New York State. History is a amazing thing when you live it. Thank You to all the Great Americans who made this possible.WE just never forget and always look up to our forefathers(and Mothers).

    Like

    • Nicolas Protonotarios says:

      Hi John

      My name is Nicolas Protonotarios (Athens, Greece). I have come across a knife similar to a 225Q given to me in Crete. It has a faded stamping reading approx …NDIT JIBATI .

      Can I send you photos to help identify its origin?

      Thank you

      Like

  4. Jraptor59 says:

    My Uncle had one of these knives he was issued in WWII. He was left handed and told me that at the time, lefties were issued this knife with the left side sheath.

    Like

  5. Doug Heinen says:

    Found one of the 225Q’s in 1985 buried in the dirt while excavating for a foundation for a new garage. All the handle material had deteriorated and was falling off and the steel was heavily pitted and rusted. In 1985 I had no resources for researching what it even was! I took some nice walnut and epoxied a new handle on it and still have it today.

    Like

  6. Thomas barnes says:

    My uncle Ike served in WWll. When he came home maybe on discharge (I was about9 or 10 and specifically RECALL the knife. Somehow the knife came in my mother and fathers possession as my grans uncle likes parents stayed with us. Over the years as I worked in my fathers appliance shop the 225Q was always in the way and subject to be used for whatever. Recently as I was cleaning up stuff at my house I ran across the knife and decided to clean it up and carry it on my belt. I am now 84 years of age and am enjoying refurbishing .It is just luck that I didn’t throw it away as it was in sad looking shape when i ran across it.

    Like

  7. James Biggs. says:

    Greetings. was poking about on YouTube ran a cross a combat knife Video, and decided to take a look at the Old Army knife that I acquired from my dad when i was a Kid. it’s a Cattaraugus 225Q with its old beat up sheath, the blade is worse for the wear but still sharp. I’d post a Pic if i could figure out how.

    Like

  8. John Belknap says:

    My name is John C. Belknap III…
    I have a Cattaraugus 225Q …. Five of my Uncle’s were in WWII three Marines, one Navy and one Army . The first of the Five Brothers unlisted in the Marines at the start. I have his Cattaraugus 225Q and as a young boy sat for hours listen to all Five during family reunions about all of there stores. As to the left hand sheath this was designed this way so while on the move rifle butt’s did not bang against the knife that would have originally been right handed. I am a Lefty and at no time in the history of the US Military make concessions for any one in forward combat situations. Of course today depending on your MOS and skill set that would be an option .Also two of my childhood friends family members who also were Marines in the Pacific confirmed that reason as well .

    Thank you
    John C. Belknap III

    Like

  9. Dan says:

    I found a Cattaraugus 225Q in my grandfather’s garage. Glad I was able to read the inscription on the blade and find this write-up about it. The knife needs sharpening, and I need to find a sheath. Are these knives worth anything to a collector? My grandfather didn’t serve in the military but this is still a cool family heirloom.

    Like

  10. Sandra Wales says:

    I have a knife that looks exactly the same. The only difference is the name mine is Kasiu. And a serial number on other side. I am in UK was given to my husband by his grandfather who fought WW2. Was thinking of selling but would like to know more. No sheath sadly

    Like

    • rthtgnbs says:

      That’s very interesting, I’ve not heard of any Q pattern knives not made by Cattaraugus or Case. If you could share pictures online that would probably help out many vintage knife aficionados.

      Like

  11. Vincent Dorsey says:

    Got a 225Q from my dads fishing tackle box in the 70’s. He was a farmer, never in the military, but he knew a good knife when he saw one. He told me he paid 50 cents for it out of a barrel of surplus stuff in a hardware store in Ashland, KS back in 45/46. He kept that knife out of sight for many years, but when he passed, I got it. The knife had seen hard use before dad got it but its still very sharp. When I got it, the scabbard was toast so I had it copied. A keeper for sure.

    Like

  12. Stax says:

    I have a CASE 337-6 marked “CASE” only. I’ve read it’s the rarest of the bunch. Mines in fine shape too with a nice original sheath with the owners service number and name on the belt loop. Looks like he scrolled a profile image of a naked woman on the front. Lol. (Theatre porn)
    The handle is in remarkable shape as is the blade. The pommel looks unused. I’ve heard it said this version may have been for the smaller Navy contract which would be fine by me since I’m a Marine Vet and we’ve been known to acknowledge the Navy occasionally. Lol

    Like

Leave a comment